Progress to Yes: What does a radical democracy look like?

Iain Robertson provides a report from the Progress to Yes conference in Aberdeen on Sunday 29 May.

What does a radical democracy look like?

An independent Scotland will have a brand-new, written constitution. But what will it say? Where will power rest, and how will it be exercised? How will it allow people to hold our new government to account? Join activists from the Radical Independence Campaign in this short participatory workshop, where everyone in the room will form a Constituent Assembly in miniature, deliberating over what a progressive constitution will look like. At the end, we’ll bring together and publish the most popular ideas as a contribution to the debate about how an independent Scotland should be governed.

This session was organised by the Radical Independence Campaign (RIC) and was run as a workshop involving three groups of participants (26 in total) discussing what the key elements of a new Scottish constitution might include. The aim was NOT to come up with a model constitution in 25 minutes of discussion but, rather, to demonstrate the method of participatory and democratic policy formulation (in contrast, say, with being handed down one or two options to be amended then voted on).

Despite the time constraints, each group submitted a written report, necessarily brief and they comprised headings and pointers rather than fleshed out proposals.

Nevertheless, they provide a flavour of what a constitution could look like and they reflect the aspirations of some of those closely involved in campaigns for Independence. The following points are a collation from the three groups. I have tried to represent as accurately as I could each point. Wordings have been altered on occasion to give clarity.

  • The sovereignty of the people should be a guiding principle in the framing of a constitution
  • A constitution should be capable of being amended with a set threshold to be decided.
  • Democracy should be operated at a more local level including financial/spending controls.
  • Those at the upper levels of power found to have broken laws or parliamentary rules should resign or immediately submit themselves to the electorate via a by-election.
  • There needs to be a mechanism for enabling greater accountability of elected representatives at all levels of government.
  • The extended use of referenda should be a required part of the democratic decision making (reference the Swiss canton model).
  • A federal model with separation of powers.
  • Commitments to environmental sustainability and social justice.
  • The constitution should be framed in clear, easily understood language, not legalese.

Is it not likely that an aspirational constitution paving the way towards a radically improved democracy compared to the current electoral dictatorship of Westminster would be a powerful tool in the armoury to further develop the argument for independence?

We should be working now to frame a constitution and that work should be done by ourselves.